We’ve been taking a look at the S&P report that covers the Nevsky Capital Eastern European Fund. It makes for interesting reading and we thought that it might be useful to present some of the highlights here at Nevsky News, where they will be available to individuals and those looking to learn more.
The report was produced in August 2011 and the opinion offered in the report is dated July 2011. It begins by discussing the fact that the Nevsky team focuses on two funds, with the Eastern European Fund obviously being one of them. It’s remarked upon that there have been substantial inflows into the fund – meaning that more people were looking to invest in this fund. That will certainly have pleased Martin Taylor and Nick Barnes of Nevsky Capital, giving them more scope.
Indeed, it’s noted that the team had taken the decision to soft close the fund. At the time, the team consisted of two fund managers, two economists and no fewer than 6 sector-specific analysts. It’s to be expected that a substantial team would be required.
In general, between 25 and 40 holdings are reckoned to be held at any one time. S&P suggest that a very active approach is taken to management, with a concentration of time and effort on studying the fundamentals of countries, sectors and individual companies.
The fund is awared a AAA rating from S&P. What that means is that the fund is seen to demonstrate the highest measures of quality within its sector. This information is based upon the investment process, although this only tells part of the story.
There is also a view taken on the consistency of performance achieved by the management, with specific consideration given to how such levels of performance compare with other funds that operate with similar objectives.
Reading through the report, it’s clear that S&P have given the fund something of a “thumbs up”, but it’s clearly for each of us to observe and to research, prior to making investment decisions.
When you carry out your own research, you may regard such analysts’ reports as being part of the wider package of information that’s made available to you. They may be informative, or you may feel that they are simply to be ignored. That choice is very much your own, leaving you to make the right decisions for your own, personal circumstances.